Podcast published on September 5, 2024
Emerging markets can be major drivers for global growth. Jeffrey Wang, CFA, Senior Equity Analyst, discusses trends and investment opportunities in the emerging markets space.
00:00:01 - 00:00:18
Podcast intro
Welcome to Think Again, a podcast by Macquarie Asset Management, providing financial advisors with a fresh perspective and innovative insights designed to keep you and your clients a step ahead.
00:00:19 - 00:00:34
Denise St. Ivany
Thanks for tuning in to Think Again. I’m Denise St. Ivany. Today I'm joined by Jeffrey Wang, Senior Equity Analyst at Macquarie Asset Management. Jeffrey is based in Boston and is responsible for covering Asia for Macquarie’s Emerging Markets Equity strategy.
Jeffrey, thanks for joining us today.
00:00:35
Jeffrey Wang
Thanks for having me, Denise.
00:00:36 - 00:00:53
Denise St. Ivany
Let's jump right in.
Today we are talking about emerging markets, which can offer investors a unique exposure to a range of industries and countries, with the benefits of diversifying their portfolio.
So, Jeffrey, can you tell us about the team's background and what the strategy looks for in emerging market companies?
00:00:53 - 00:05:49
Jeffrey Wang
I'll start with our team. The first thing I'd say about our team is that we're a very seasoned group of investors. I think the range of experience we have is between 19 and 28 years. I think that's something which is really important for our approach to investing in emerging markets, which is very grounded in bottom-up fundamental research and depth of experience and knowledge and understanding of these companies. I think the experience that we have amongst our team is really helpful as far as providing that context and living through the ups and downs and all the changes
that have happened over the past 20+ years or so in emerging markets. And hopefully that will provide that context that helps us to hopefully make better decisions. So, I think that's one thing I'd like to emphasize about our team.
The second point I'd emphasize is that we're a very diverse group of individuals. So I think we have very interesting and varied backgrounds. Our portfolio manager was a medical doctor, for example. We have another analyst who was a software engineer.
The last point I would say about our team is just the incentive structure is all very much geared around the strategy’s performance. I think we're all very much aligned as far as what matters, and that is the strategy’s performance. There's no real sense of what's yours, what’s mine. Your idea, your contribution. Everyone is really looking to promote the best outcome for the strategy as a whole. And that's something which, again, we feel really helps to promote honest and robust discussion and hopefully good outcomes for our investor base.
With respect to the strategy, our approach to investing in emerging markets really revolves around three key pillars.
I think that the first one I'd highlight is structural growth opportunities. This is something that we feel is very essential for companies to be able to command full valuations. I think markets ultimately run on optimism. Markets really have to see something exciting in order to be willing to ascribe fair valuations to the stocks. And in the absence of those compelling growth opportunities, in our experience, the market can really ascribe arbitrarily large and persistent discounts. So, I think the idea that companies we invest in should have structural growth opportunities is something that we feel is very important in terms of what we look for in companies.
But the second point I'd say is that growth is not enough. We have to obviously understand that in the context of competition, the best growth opportunities in the world may not ultimately result in much profitability if there's too much competition. So the second pillar that we emphasize is competition, as well as the ability for individual companies to capture value. I think within the context of those growth opportunities we really try to understand the value chain, where the companies fit along there, and who's best positioned to participate and benefit from that, and keep competition at bay or at least gain market share. And over time, perhaps even capture more value from that.
Competition is something that we focus a lot on. And we feel that probably the most important determinant of getting an investment right is really understanding that competitive landscape.
The third pillar is valuation. So, again, there are great growth opportunities in companies which have very strong competitive advantages. But truthfully, the good companies are often times very well appreciated by the market, and the market can be willing to ascribe valuations that don't necessarily make sense in the context of what's possible. I would say that, for us, valuation is important so that we can construct a portfolio that has favorable risk-reward characteristics. We want to ensure that we're investing in companies that have good upside potential but also good protection on the downside. And in addition to that, it's also important from the perspective of trying to minimize and reduce the risk of permanent capital loss. So for us, the valuation mindset is one that is oriented toward absolute value – really thinking about the assets, the business, what do we think the company is worth, as opposed to just looking at relative valuations or comparing valuation history. That's something which is really how we approach valuation.
I'll just conclude by emphasizing that all of the above – growth opportunities, competition, valuation – for us, we really look at these with a medium-term time horizon. Really looking ahead to the next 5-7 years and thinking about what might change in terms of the industry, in terms of the growth. And that's something which we feel is important as far as being well placed for the future, as opposed to just looking solely at what's happened in the past or the present or even the next year or so, which is typically what the market focuses on.
00:05:50 - 00:06:02
Denise St. Ivany
Certainly a multitude of factors, but you did identify the long-term growth opportunities and trends as being one of those pillars that you're focused on.
Where are you seeing those opportunities and trends right now?
00:06:03 - 00:09:14
Jeffrey Wang
Great question, Denise. I think that from a historical perspective, the long-standing arguments in favor of investing in emerging markets have relied on demographics and urbanization, improving productivity, rising incomes, and improving lifestyles. Among those, we would really highlight productivity improvement as probably the area of most promise, if we look ahead to the future and what might drive growth opportunities.
I came across a book recently published by the World Bank in 2021. It was called “Global Productivity Trends, Drivers and Policies,” I believe, and a really interesting observation that came from that was that productivity levels in emerging markets are still only less than 20% of those of advanced economies. And that's something which, I think, still leaves a lot of room for potential improvement. Now, I'm not saying that this is going to go from 20% to 100%, but certainly that 20% level does seem like a fairly low base to still drive a lot of growth going forward. When we think about sort of what areas might help drive that productivity improvement, it could be from a number of areas. From our perspective, we do believe that technology, digitalization, all the advancements which are happening in technology and computing, from a long-term perspective, can be very impactful as far as how they could improve productivity in emerging markets. Even if we're thinking about agriculture, for example, there are a lot of economies which are still quite heavily dependent on agriculture, and thinking about how technology might help to improve the productivity of that part of the economy, that's something which could be impactful from a longer-term perspective.
I think a second area that we would highlight is just the competitiveness. We have seen some real improvement on a selective basis in terms of companies’ competitiveness. Emerging market competitiveness, I should say. Examples like in the semiconductor space or in the consumer space. And I think if we can sort of see more of this broadening out to other parts of emerging markets then certainly there's an argument to be made that we would believe there are opportunities here to capture more value, capture more market share. And that in turn, we feel, could also be a driver of productivity growth.
A third potential area would be shifts in cultural norms. I think historically one of the reasons why productivity improvement has been held back in some emerging markets is just simply because of some cultural considerations. Whether it's attitudes toward corporate governance or incentive structures, or even female participation in the labor force. And I think it's easy to think of these as being very entrenched and intractable, but selectively I think we are starting to see some areas of improvement. From our perspective, it's really thinking about that longer-term stamp perspective and thinking about how these opportunities might actually help to revive growth in emerging markets after a very, very challenging decade from a growth perspective.
00:09:15 - 00:09:29
Denise St. Ivany
And then you've also got a whole other different area there, with emerging markets being impacted by some major macroeconomic factors in recent years.
Can you explain what you're seeing and what you and your team pay attention to right now in that area?
00:09:30 - 00:11:07
Jeffrey Wang
Macro has always been a part of investing in emerging markets. You can't escape it, and you can't ignore it. You have to really pay attention to it and try your best to understand what's going on. But I think we ultimately try to focus on what's happening at an individual country and company level and what are you doing to try to endure through these challenges? How are you positioning yourself for the future? And how are you looking to protect your growth opportunities, your competitiveness? How are you looking to enhance your competitiveness? That's really, when we think about these macro issues, where I'd say the tough times have highlighted or accentuated some key differences at a country and company level, ones that have struggled a bit more. And I think the same is true at an individual company level. When times are tough, it's the good companies that find a way to come through that. Whether it's through strength of balance sheet, reinvesting in their core competencies, or just finding ways to take advantage of weak competitors to gain market share. That's really how we think about these macro headwinds, where we look for it, certainly from a risk perspective, to ensure that, or feel comfortable that, whatever is happening at a macro level doesn't ultimately destroy the business or undermine their ability to survive or stay relevant. But also just looking for those opportunities where perhaps there's just too much negativity or too much focus around the risk or the volatility and underappreciating what companies are actually doing about it, or how they're standing out in a positive way.
00:11:08 - 00:11:13
Denise St. Ivany
What about, to be more specific, growth challenges in China? Would you have anything to add there?
00:11:14 - 00:12:58
Jeffrey Wang
Our perspective on China historically has always been one of, let's focus on the companies. Let's focus on which ones are actually positioned to capture growth opportunities, because even during the high growth years for China, I think we've always held the concern that this is not sustainable. A lot of it is driven by excessive investment in unproductive capacity or government spending that was really more for national service. So, even during that time, we were a bit skeptical of the sustainability of the growth. But I think there are also still reasons to be optimistic about trends in terms of technology adoption and efficiency, and improving living standards. Through the years, that's really always been a focus of ours in terms of investing in China.
I'd say more recently, the growth challenges have become much more apparent to everyone who's observing, and I think a little bit difficult to see how that's going to change going forward. There are no easy fixes in this, in that sense. We all know about the challenges with respect to the property market, and I think the consumer confidence at this point continues to suffer as a result of all the policies which happened over the years, in terms of COVID restrictions but also the crackdowns on some of these higher-profile companies in the internet sector. So I’d say, from that perspective, the growth outlook in China does appear more uncertain. I don't think this is necessarily going to get worse, but as far as seeing how China can revive its growth opportunities, I'd say that a lot of it does come down to shifts in policy.
00:12:59 - 00:13:09
Denise St. Ivany
The emerging markets strategy is getting ready to launch an active ETF at Macquarie. Can you highlight some of the similarities and differences in how you will manage these vehicles?
00:13:10 - 00:14:08
Jeffrey Wang
We're very excited about this ETF launch that’s upcoming, and I think from a philosophical perspective, management will be very similar. There will be no change or no difference in terms of the ethos of what we're looking for, and I think even when it comes to the higher-conviction stocks in the portfolio, those should be represented in fairly similar fashion. I think the key differences would be, first, number of holdings. For the ETF, we're looking at fewer holdings, in more of the 35-60 stock range, as opposed to through the 90+ range. So, in that sense, I think we're looking to be a little bit more selective in terms of what we're investing in in the ETF. With respect to asset size, the mutual fund is quite sizable in terms of its asset base. Whereas for the ETF, as a newer strategy, there may be more opportunities to get some more exposure to some of these stocks that may not have the best liquidity profiles.
00:14:09 - 00:14:15
Denise St. Ivany
Jeffrey, thank you for joining us. I really appreciate you taking the time to share your insight and your expertise with us today.
00:14:16
Jeffrey Wang
Great. Appreciate the opportunity.
00:14:17 - 00:14:30
Denise St. Ivany
Don't forget, you can find more insights from our investment teams on our website. You can find more information in the episode show notes as well.
Don't forget to join us next time on Think Again, when we will discuss another topic for investors to consider.
00:14:33 - 00:14:43
Podcast outro
Thanks for listening. Check out the show notes for more information on topics from this episode and be sure to subscribe to Think Again wherever you get your podcasts.
Learn more about how Jeffrey and our Emerging Markets Equity Team put their views into practice in Macquarie Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). This ETF provides access to the team’s time-tested investment philosophy in an actively managed portfolio of 35-60 stocks. These high-conviction investment ideas seek to capture long-term secular growth opportunities in emerging markets.
Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
The views expressed in this podcast represent those of the speaker and are subject to change. Nothing presented should be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell any security or follow any investment technique or strategy, and does not constitute advice, an advertisement, an invitation, a confirmation, an offer or a solicitation to engage in any investment activity, or an offer of any banking or financial service.
All examples herein are for illustrative purposes only and there can be no assurance that any particular investment objective will be realised or any investment strategy seeking to achieve such objective will be successful.
Before acting on any information, you should consider the appropriateness of it having regard to your particular objectives, financial situation and needs and seek advice.
No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information, opinions and conclusions presented. In preparing these recordings, reliance has been placed, without independent verification, on the accuracy and completeness of all information available from external sources.
Carefully consider the Fund's investment objectives, risk factors, and charges and expenses before investing. This and other information can be found in the Fund's prospectus or the summary prospectus, which may be obtained by visiting the Macquarie ETF Trust resource pages or calling 844 469-9911. Read the prospectus carefully before investing.
The Macquarie ETF Trust Funds are distributed by Foreside Financial Services, LLC. Foreside Financial Services, LLC is not affiliated with any Macquarie entity, including Macquarie Asset Management and Delaware Distributors, L.P.
Macquarie ETF Trust exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are actively managed and do not seek to replicate a specific index. ETF shares are bought and sold through an exchange at the then current market price, not net asset value (NAV), and are not individually redeemed from the fund. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to their NAV when traded on an exchange. Brokerage commissions will reduce returns. There can be no guarantee that an active market for ETFs will develop or be maintained, or that the ETF's listing will continue or remain unchanged.
Investing in any exchange-traded fund involves the risk that you may lose part or all of the money you invest. Over time, the value of your investment in the Fund will increase and decrease according to changes in the value of the securities in the Fund’s portfolio. An investment in the Fund may not be appropriate for all investors.
Diversification may not protect against market risk and cannot assure a profit.
The Fund’s principal risks include but are not limited to the following:
Market risk is the risk that all or a majority of the securities in a certain market - such as the stock or bond market - will decline in value because of factors such as adverse political or economic conditions, future expectations, investor confidence, or heavy institutional selling.
Foreign and emerging markets risk is the risk that international investing (particularly in emerging markets) may be adversely affected by political instability; changes in currency exchange rates; inefficient markets and higher transaction costs; foreign economic conditions; the imposition of economic or trade sanctions; or inadequate or different regulatory and accounting standards. The risk associated with international investing will be greater in emerging markets than in more developed foreign markets because, among other things, emerging markets may have less stable political and economic environments. In addition, there often is substantially less publicly available information about issuers and such information tends to be of a lesser quality. Economic markets and structures tend to be less mature and diverse and the securities markets may also be smaller, less liquid, and subject to greater price volatility.
Company size risk is the risk that investments in small- and/or medium-sized companies may be more volatile than those of larger companies because of limited financial resources or dependence on narrow product lines.
Liquidity risk is the possibility that investments cannot be readily sold within seven calendar days at approximately the price at which a fund has valued them.
Industry and sector risk is the risk that the value of securities in a particular industry or sector (such as the infrastructure industry) will decline because of changing expectations for the performance of that industry or sector.
Government and regulatory risk is the risk that governments or regulatory authorities may take actions that could adversely affect various sectors of the securities markets and affect fund performance.
Geographic focus risk is the risk that local political and economic conditions could adversely affect the performance of a fund investing a substantial amount of assets in securities of issuers located in a single country or a limited number of countries. Adverse events in any one country within the Asia-Pacific region may impact the other countries in the region or Asia as a whole. As a result, adverse events in the region will generally have a greater effect on the Fund than if the Fund were more geographically diversified, which could result in greater volatility in the Fund’s net asset value and losses. Markets in the greater China region can experience significant volatility due to social, economic, regulatory, and political uncertainties.
Limited number of securities risk is the possibility that a single security’s increase or decrease in value may have a greater impact on a fund’s value and total return because the fund may hold larger positions in fewer securities than other funds. In addition, a fund that holds a limited number of securities may be more volatile than those funds that hold a greater number of securities.
Growth stocks reflect projections of future earnings and revenue. These prices may rise or fall dramatically depending on whether those projections are met. These companies’ stock prices may be more volatile, particularly over the short term.
A nondiversified fund has the flexibility to invest as much as 50% of its assets in as few as two issuers with no single issuer accounting for more than 25% of the fund. The remaining 50% of its assets must be diversified so that no more than 5% of its assets are invested in the securities of a single issuer. Because a nondiversified fund may invest its assets in fewer issuers, the value of its shares may increase or decrease more rapidly than if it were fully diversified.
The Funds are actively managed. The Manager applies a Fund's investment strategies and selects securities for the Fund in seeking to achieve the Fund's investment objective(s). There can be no guarantee that its decisions will produce the desired results, and securities selected by a Fund may not perform as well as the securities held by other exchange-traded funds with investment objectives that are similar to the investment objective(s) of the Fund. In general, investment decisions made by the Manager may not produce the anticipated returns, may cause a Fund's shares to lose value or may cause a Fund to perform less favorably than other exchange-traded funds with similar investment objectives.
The Fund is an ETF, and, as a result of an ETF’s structure, it is exposed to the following risks: “Authorized participants, market makers and liquidity providers concentration risk,” “Secondary Market Trading Risk” and “Shares may trade at prices other than NAV risk.”
Only authorized participants (“APs”) may engage in creation or redemption transactions directly with the Fund. The Fund has a limited number of financial institutions that are institutional investors and may act as APs. In addition, there may be a limited number of market makers and/or liquidity providers in the marketplace, and they have no obligation to submit creation or redemption orders. To the extent either of the following events occur, the Fund’s shares may trade at a material discount to net asset value (“NAV”) and possibly face delisting: (i) APs exit the business or otherwise become unable to process creation and/or redemption orders and no other APs step forward to perform these services, or (ii) market makers and/or liquidity providers exit the business or significantly reduce their business activities and no other entities step forward to perform their functions. These events, among others, may lead to the Fund’s shares trading at a premium or discount to NAV. A diminished market for an ETF's shares substantially increases the risk that a shareholder may pay considerably more or receive significantly less than the underlying value of the ETF shares bought or sold.
Although the Fund’s shares are listed on a national securities exchange, The NASDAQ stock exchange may be traded on U.S. exchanges other than the Exchange, there can be no assurance that an active or liquid trading market for them will develop or be maintained. In addition, trading in the Fund’s shares on the Exchange may be halted. In addition, an exchange or market may issue trading halts on specific securities or financial instruments. As a result, the ability to trade certain securities or financial instruments may be restricted, which may disrupt the Fund’s creation/redemption process or affect the price at which shares trade in the secondary market.
As with all ETFs, shares of the Fund may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. The Fund’s NAV is calculated at the end of each business day and fluctuates with changes in the market value of the Fund’s holdings, while the trading price of the shares fluctuates continuously throughout trading hours on the Exchange, based on both the relative market supply of, and demand for, the shares and the underlying value of the Fund’s holdings. As a result, although it is expected that the market price of the Fund’s shares will approximate the Fund’s NAV, there may be times when the market price of the Fund’s shares is more than the NAV intra-day (premium) or less than the NAV intra-day (discount). This risk is heightened in times of market volatility or periods of steep market declines.
Transactions in shares of ETFs will result in brokerage commissions and will generate tax consequences. All regulated investment companies are obliged to distribute portfolio gains to shareholders.
Shares of ETFs are bought and sold at market price (not NAV) and are not individually redeemed from the fund. Any applicable brokerage commissions will reduce returns.
The Fund is a newly organized, management investment company with no operating history. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Fund will grow to, or maintain, an economically viable size, in which case the Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “Board") may determine to liquidate the Fund.
All third-party marks cited are the property of their respective owners.
Nothing presented should be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell any security or follow any investment technique or strategy.
Not FDIC Insured • No Bank Guarantee • May Lose Value
You can check the background of your investment professional on FINRA's BrokerCheck.
[3926589-10/24 | MET-684711]